Skip to content

Why Beckwith is Able to Stay a Member at ETS

May 7, 2007

Yesterday, I mentioned that Beckwith’s affirmation of the ETS doctrinal statement and decision to stay a member should be reproof for ETS.  The reason being is the statement is so skimpy.  Ray Van Neste called it a bikini statement, meaning that it covers nothing. Van Neste presented a paper at ETS that proposes changes in the ETS doctrinal statement.  Here is the link provided by Carl Trueman –

‘Does the ETS Doctrinal Statement Say Enough?’

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: