Skip to content

Wells and the Person of Christ – A Subordinating Son (3)

June 9, 2009

David Wells, rightly (in my mind), understands the nature of the relationship of the Son to the Father as an Submission/Authority relationship, in the chapter on the Identity of Jesus in The Person of Christ.  He writes that the relational authority of the Father “will remain unchanged, presumably, even after the Son has resumed his glory (1 Cor. 24-28).”  He later asks, “How far, then do the exigences of this submission, the conditions of this subordination, affect the nature of the divine Jesus? (emphasis mine)”  Wells makes the distinction between functional and metaphysical subordination.  Even in Philippians 2, the term “emptied” himself is not a metaphysical claim, but “As the divine light passes through the darkened glass of his humanity, it is obscured but not refracted.  In Jesus, God became incognito, but he did not disappear, he is hidden, but not lost.”

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: